Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

The promise of transcranial focused ultrasound in disorders of consciousness: a narrative review

Abstract

Transcranial focused ultrasound (tFUS) has emerged as a promising non-invasive neuromodulation technique for disorders of consciousness (DOC). This work critically evaluates tFUS's potential, highlighting its unique ability to precisely modulate deep brain structures, particularly the thalamus, while maintaining non-invasiveness. The mechanisms of action span multiple levels, from membrane-level ion channel modulation to network-wide changes in neural connectivity. Preclinical and early clinical studies have demonstrated tFUS's potential to improve DOC outcomes. Preliminary clinical trials in both acute and chronic DOC patients have shown encouraging results, including diagnostic category shifts, improvements in behavioral responsiveness, and alterations in thalamo-cortical connectivity. However, significant challenges remain. These include optimizing stimulation parameters, addressing variability in patient responses, and ensuring long-term safety. The current evidence base is limited, necessitating larger, more rigorous investigations. Future research should focus on multicenter randomized controlled trials to comprehensively evaluate tFUS across different DOC etiologies and chronicity. Key priorities include identifying predictive biomarkers, exploring combination therapies, and addressing ethical considerations. While tFUS shows significant promise in DOC management, further investigation is crucial to refine its application and establish its definitive clinical role.

Introduction

Disorders of consciousness (DOC), including coma, vegetative state, and minimally conscious state, present a significant challenge in clinical neurology [1]. Despite advances in diagnosis and supportive care, effective treatments for DOC remain limited [2]. In recent years, transcranial focused ultrasound (tFUS) has emerged as a promising non-invasive neuromodulation technique that can modulate deep brain structures in DOC patients, potentially improving consciousness and functional connectivity [3,4,5,6]. While tFUS has shown promise in several other neurological conditions such as Parkinson's disease [7], chronic pain [8], essential tremor [9], epilepsy [10], and stroke [11], clinical evidence in these disorders remains limited compared to DOC, highlighting the need for further investigation to establish tFUS's therapeutic role across neurological diseases. In this narrative review, we examine current evidence, challenges, and future directions to establish a foundation for the clinical translation of tFUS in DOC management.

Unique advantages of tFUS in DOC treatment

tFUS utilizes low-intensity ultrasound waves (0.25–0.5 MHz) delivered through a single-element transducer or multi-element array to focally modulate specific brain regions (Fig. 1). Its unique ability to target small areas (few millimeters in diameter) deep within the brain while maintaining non-invasiveness makes it particularly promising for DOC treatment [5, 12,13,14].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic illustration of tFUS targeting the thalamus. Abbreviation: tFUS: Transcranial focused ultrasound

The unique properties of tFUS offer significant advantages over other neuromodulation techniques. Unlike deep brain stimulation (DBS), which has shown promise in DOC but requires invasive surgery, tFUS is associated with lower risks and broader applicability [15]. While transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are also non-invasive, they primarily affect superficial cortical regions and lack the spatial specificity and deep brain targeting capability of tFUS [16, 17]. This limitation restricts their ability to directly modulate subcortical structures crucial for consciousness, such as the thalamus.

Thus, tFUS uniquely combines non-invasiveness with precise targeting of deep brain structures, positioning it as a potentially transformative approach in DOC treatment. Its ability to focus on specific deep brain regions without affecting intervening tissues offers a level of precision and safety that is unmatched by other current neuromodulation techniques.

Mechanisms of action

The precise mechanisms by which tFUS modulates neural activity are still under investigation. However, several hypotheses have been proposed. One prevailing hypothesis suggests that ultrasound waves cause mechanical deformation of neuronal membranes. This deformation results in changes in membrane capacitance and the opening of voltage-gated ion channels [18, 19] (Fig. 2). This can result in altered neural excitability and firing patterns. Another hypothesis proposes that ultrasound induces cavitation in the lipid bilayer of cell membranes, potentially affecting membrane properties and cellular signaling [20].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Multi-level mechanisms of tFUS neuromodulation. A Membrane-level effects showing ultrasound-induced modulation of ion channels; B Synaptic-level changes demonstrating enhanced excitatory and reduced inhibitory transmission; C Network-level modulation of thalamo-cortical connectivity. ACC Anterior cingulate cortex, PFC Prefrontal cortex, M1 Primary motor cortex, tFUS Transcranial focused ultrasound

Recent studies have provided insights into the neurophysiological effects of tFUS, particularly in the context of DOC. Thalamo-cortical connectivity, which is crucial for the regulation of consciousness, appears to be a primary target of tFUS modulation. Legon et al. demonstrated that tFUS targeting the thalamus in healthy humans could modulate thalamo-cortical functional connectivity, as measured by electroencephalography (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) [21]. This finding is particularly relevant for DOC, as disrupted thalamo-cortical connectivity is a hallmark of these conditions [22, 23].

Furthermore, emerging evidence suggests that tFUS may influence multiple pathways relevant to consciousness and recovery. Studies have shown that tFUS can enhance dopamine release in the striatum [24], suggesting its potential to modulate neurotransmitter systems involved in arousal and consciousness. Additionally, preclinical studies have demonstrated that tFUS can improve neurological outcomes through various mechanisms, including enhanced cerebral blood flow, reduced neuroinflammation, and improved brain edema clearance [25, 26]. These findings suggest that tFUS may be particularly beneficial in DOC resulting from various etiologies, including ischemic injuries and traumatic brain injury.

Interestingly, the effects of tFUS appear to be highly dependent on stimulation parameters such as frequency, intensity, and duty cycle. Plaksin et al. demonstrated that different tFUS parameters could induce either excitatory or inhibitory effects on neural activity in mice [27]. This parameter-dependent effect offers the potential for precise tuning of neural modulation, which could be crucial for optimizing tFUS protocols in DOC treatment.

Clinical evidence in DOC

The clinical translation of tFUS in DOC began with a groundbreaking case report by Monti et al. in 2016. They applied tFUS to the thalamus of a 25-year-old male patient with acute DOC, 19 days post-injury, using a frequency of 650 kHz and a pulse repetition frequency of 100 Hz. The patient showed remarkable improvement, with Coma recovery scale–revised (CRS-R) scores increasing from 14–15 to 13–17 post-tFUS. More significantly, the patient demonstrated full language comprehension and reliable communication three days post-tFUS, and attempted to walk five days post-tFUS [28]. This initial success demonstrated both the feasibility and potential efficacy of tFUS in DOC patients.

Building on this promising result, Cain and colleagues conducted a series of systematic investigations that progressively expanded both the scope and scale of tFUS application in DOC. Their research trajectory began with a pilot study of three chronic DOC patients [4], evolved to include 11 acute DOC patients [29], and culminated in a larger cohort study of 10 chronic DOC patients [30]. These studies shared a common protocol of targeting the left central thalamus, but varied in patient characteristics and follow-up duration.

The results across these studies showed a consistent pattern of improvement in a subset of patients. In the 11 acute DOC patients, a single tFUS session led to significant increases in CRS-R scores (p = 0.014), with 4 patients (approximately 36%) showing diagnostic category improvements (coma to VS, VS to MCS) [29]. In the 10 chronic DOC patients, two sessions administered one week apart resulted in similar positive outcomes, with 4 patients (40%) demonstrating diagnostic improvements (VS/MCS- to MCS + /eMCS) and significant linear increases in CRS-R scores (p = 0.019 for total score) [30]. Importantly, fMRI analyses revealed that behavioral improvements correlated with specific changes in thalamic functional connectivity—decreased connectivity between the targeted thalamus and frontal regions (including prefrontal cortex and striatum) coupled with increased connectivity with the contralateral motor cortex, parietal and occipital lobes in both acute and chronic patients [29, 30]. These bidirectional connectivity changes provide mechanistic support for the observed clinical benefits.

Challenges and limitations

While initial tFUS studies in DOC patients show promise, the current evidence base remains limited. To date, only four clinical studies have been published [4, 28,29,30], including one case report and three small cohort studies with a total of 24 patients (1 patient in the initial case report, 3 patients in the first pilot study, 11 patients in the acute DOC study, and 10 patients in the chronic DOC study). This small sample size and limited number of studies represent a significant limitation. Additionally, several other challenges need to be addressed to fully harness tFUS's potential as a therapeutic intervention. The efficacy of tFUS varies across different patient subgroups, with patients suffering from traumatic brain injury, acute DOC, or in a minimally conscious state potentially showing better responses. Younger patients and those with preserved thalamo-cortical connections might also benefit more from this treatment. However, the factors influencing treatment outcomes are not fully understood, as evidenced by the study of Cain et al., where one out of three chronic DOC patients exhibited no significant improvement after tFUS sessions [4]. This variability in patient responses highlights the need for a better understanding of the characteristics predicting treatment efficacy, which could help refine patient selection criteria and personalize tFUS protocols (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Hierarchical challenges of tFUS application in DOC treatment. DOC Disorders of consciousness, tFUS Transcranial focused ultrasound

A significant challenge in tFUS application is the determination of optimal stimulation parameters. Current studies have employed a range of frequencies, intensities, and durations, necessitating a systematic comparison of their efficacy and safety [31]. Additionally, individual variability in skull thickness and density can affect ultrasound wave propagation, potentially leading to inconsistent tFUS effects across patients [32]. These technical challenges underscore the importance of developing advanced neuronavigation techniques and personalized computational models. Such advancements could ensure more precise targeting of deep brain structures, potentially improving response rates and minimizing adverse effects [21, 33].

While tFUS is generally considered safe, current safety assessments in DOC patients have been limited to basic vital parameter monitoring and adverse event documentation, with no serious adverse effects reported across 24 patients in 4 DOC studies [4, 28,29,30]. However, small studies in other neurological conditions have reported mild and transient adverse effects, including headache, neck pain, somnolence, scalp tingling, and drowsiness, typically resolving within 24 h without worsening upon repeated stimulation [34,35,36]. Establishing safety thresholds specific to therapeutic neuromodulation in DOC patients, accounting for factors such as skull density, repeated exposures, and patient conditions, remains crucial. Future DOC studies should implement rigorous safety protocols, including advanced neuroimaging to assess tissue effects, extended follow-up periods (6–12 months), and standardized adverse event monitoring [34, 37, 38].

Future directions

Advancing the clinical translation of tFUS for DOC requires a comprehensive research strategy centered on large-scale, multicenter randomized controlled trials. These trials should incorporate rigorous methodological standards, including appropriate sample size calculations, predefined outcome measures, and proper randomization and blinding techniques [39]. Particular attention should be paid to controlling potential confounders such as spontaneous recovery and concurrent treatments, while implementing standardized assessment protocols to ensure reliable and comparable results across different centers (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Key future directions for tFUS in DOC. DOC Disorders of consciousness, tFUS Transcranial focused ultrasound

The optimization of tFUS protocols represents another crucial research direction. This includes developing personalized approaches based on individual patient characteristics such as etiology, duration of DOC, and neuroanatomical features [40]. The identification of reliable biomarkers or clinical characteristics that predict treatment response could significantly enhance patient selection and treatment outcomes [1].

Exploring combination therapies offers a promising avenue for enhancing tFUS efficacy. Future studies should investigate potential synergistic effects between tFUS and other therapeutic modalities, including pharmacological agents (e.g., amantadine, zolpidem) and rehabilitation programs [41]. Such combination approaches could potentially provide more comprehensive and effective treatment strategies for DOC patients.

As tFUS research advances, addressing ethical, legal, and social implications becomes increasingly important [42]. This includes developing guidelines for patient selection and informed consent, as well as assessing the impact on patients' quality of life and long-term outcomes [22]. Engaging diverse stakeholders—including healthcare professionals, patient advocates, and policymakers—will be crucial for responsible implementation of tFUS-based interventions.

Finally, while DOC remains the primary focus, the unique capabilities of tFUS suggest potential applications in other neurological conditions [43, 44]. Expanding research into these areas could broaden the therapeutic impact of this technology while providing valuable insights for its optimization in DOC treatment [13].

Conclusion

tFUS represents a promising frontier in DOC treatment, offering unique advantages through its ability to non-invasively modulate deep brain structures. Early clinical evidence has demonstrated encouraging results in both acute and chronic DOC patients, with improvements in consciousness levels and functional connectivity. While these findings are promising, several key challenges remain to be addressed, including optimization of stimulation parameters and understanding patient response variability. The path forward requires rigorous clinical trials, development of personalized protocols, and careful consideration of safety and ethical implications. As research progresses, tFUS has the potential to not only transform DOC treatment but also extend its benefits to other neurological conditions [45,46,47,48], bringing new hope to patients and families affected by these devastating disorders.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

ACC:

Anterior cingulate cortex

CRS-R:

Coma recovery scale–revised

DBS:

Deep brain stimulation

DOC:

Disorders of consciousness

EEG:

Electroencephalography

fMRI:

Functional magnetic resonance imaging

PFC:

Prefrontal cortex

M1:

Primary motor cortex

TBI:

Traumatic brain injury

tDCS:

Transcranial direct current stimulation

tFUS:

Transcranial focused ultrasound

TMS:

Transcranial magnetic stimulation

References

  1. Yu J, Meng F, He F, Chen F, Bao W, Yu Y, Zhou J, Gao J, Li J, Yao Y. Metabolic abnormalities in patients with chronic disorders of consciousness. Aging Dis. 2021;12(2):386.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Giacino JT, Katz DI, Schiff ND, Whyte J, Ashman EJ, Ashwal S, Barbano R, Hammond FM, Laureys S, Ling GS. Practice guideline update recommendations summary: disorders of consciousness: report of the guideline development, dissemination, and implementation subcommittee of the american academy of neurology; the American congress of rehabilitation medicine; and the national institute on disability, independent living, and rehabilitation research. Neurology. 2018;91(10):450–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Tufail Y, Yoshihiro A, Pati S, Li MM, Tyler WJ. Ultrasonic neuromodulation by brain stimulation with transcranial ultrasound. Nat Protoc. 2011;6(9):1453–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cain JA, Spivak NM, Coetzee JP, Crone JS, Johnson MA, Lutkenhoff ES, Real C, Buitrago-Blanco M, Vespa PM, Schnakers C, et al. Ultrasonic thalamic stimulation in chronic disorders of consciousness. Brain Stimul Basic Transl Clin Res Neuromodulation. 2021;14(2):301–3.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wang J, Li G, Deng L, Mamtilahun M, Jiang L, Qiu W, Zheng H, Sun J, Xie Q, Yang G-Y. Transcranial focused ultrasound stimulation improves neurorehabilitation after middle cerebral artery occlusion in mice. Aging Dis. 2021;12(1):50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Shi Y, Wu W. Advances in transcranial focused ultrasound neuromodulation for mental disorders. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2025;136:111244.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Grippe T, Shamli-Oghli Y, Darmani G, Nankoo JF, Raies N, Sarica C, Arora T, Gunraj C, Ding MYR, Rinchon C, et al. Plasticity-induced effects of theta burst transcranial ultrasound stimulation in parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.29836.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Riis TS, Feldman DA, Losser AJ, Okifuji A, Kubanek J. Noninvasive targeted modulation of pain circuits with focused ultrasonic waves. Pain. 2024;165(12):2829–39.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Riis TS, Losser AJ, Kassavetis P, Moretti P, Kubanek J. Noninvasive modulation of essential tremor with focused ultrasonic waves. J Neural Eng. 2024;21(1):016033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bubrick EJ, McDannold NJ, Orozco J, Mariano TY, Rigolo L, Golby AJ, Tie Y, White PJ. Transcranial ultrasound neuromodulation for epilepsy: a pilot safety trial. Brain Stimul. 2024;17(1):7–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang Y, Li F, He M-J, Chen S-J. The effects and mechanisms of transcranial ultrasound stimulation combined with cognitive rehabilitation on post-stroke cognitive impairment. Neurolo Sci. 2022;43(7):4315–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Legon W, Sato TF, Opitz A, Mueller J, Barbour A, Williams A, Tyler WJ. Transcranial focused ultrasound modulates the activity of primary somatosensory cortex in humans. Nat Neurosci. 2014;17(2):322–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Krishna V, Sammartino F, Rezai A. A review of the current therapies, challenges, and future directions of transcranial focused ultrasound technology: advances in diagnosis and treatment. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75(2):246–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Badran BW, Peng X. Transcranial focused ultrasound (tFUS): a promising noninvasive deep brain stimulation approach for pain. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2024;49(1):351–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Javid A, Ilham S, Kiani M. A review of ultrasound neuromodulation technologies. IEEE Trans Biomed Circ Syst. 2023;17:1084–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Scangos KW, State MW, Miller AH, Baker JT, Williams LM. New and emerging approaches to treat psychiatric disorders. Nat Med. 2023;29(2):317–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Huang W, Chen Q, Liu J, Liu L, Tang J, Zou M, Zeng T, Li H, Jiang Q, Jiang Q. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in disorders of consciousness: an update and perspectives. Aging Dis. 2023;14(4):1171.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Yoo S, Mittelstein DR, Hurt RC, Lacroix J, Shapiro MG. Focused ultrasound excites cortical neurons via mechanosensitive calcium accumulation and ion channel amplification. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):493.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sorum B, Rietmeijer RA, Gopakumar K, Adesnik H, Brohawn SG. Ultrasound activates mechanosensitive TRAAK K+ channels through the lipid membrane. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2021;118(6):e2006980118.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Blanco-González A, Marrink SJ, Piñeiro Á, García-Fandiño R. Molecular insights into the effects of focused ultrasound mechanotherapy on lipid bilayers: unlocking the keys to design effective treatments. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2023;650:1201–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Legon W, Ai L, Bansal P, Mueller JK. Neuromodulation with single-element transcranial focused ultrasound in human thalamus. Hum Brain Mapp. 2018;39(5):1995–2006.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Giacino JT, Fins JJ, Laureys S, Schiff ND. Disorders of consciousness after acquired brain injury: the state of the science. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014;10(2):99–114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Edlow BL, Claassen J, Schiff ND, Greer DM. Recovery from disorders of consciousness: mechanisms, prognosis and emerging therapies. Nat Rev Neurol. 2021;17(3):135–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Foffani G, Trigo-Damas I, Pineda-Pardo JA, Blesa J, Rodríguez-Rojas R, Martínez-Fernández R, Obeso JA. Focused ultrasound in Parkinson’s disease: a twofold path toward disease modification. Mov Disord. 2019;34(9):1262–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Guo T, Li H, Lv Y, Lu H, Niu J, Sun J, Yang G-Y, Ren C, Tong S. Pulsed transcranial ultrasound stimulation immediately after the ischemic brain injury is neuroprotective. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2015;62(10):2352–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zheng T, Du J, Yuan Y, Wu S, Jin Y, Shi Q, Wang X, Liu L. Effect of low intensity transcranial ultrasound (LITUS) on post-traumatic brain edema in rats: evaluation by isotropic 3-dimensional T2 and multi-TE T2 weighted MRI. Front Neurol. 2020;11:578638.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Plaksin M, Kimmel E, Shoham S. Cell-type-selective effects of intramembrane cavitation as a unifying theoretical framework for ultrasonic neuromodulation. Eneuro. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0136-15.2016.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Monti MM, Schnakers C, Korb AS, Bystritsky A, Vespa PM. Non-invasive ultrasonic thalamic stimulation in disorders of consciousness after severe brain injury: a first-in-man report. Brain Stimul Basic Transl Clin Res Neuromodulation. 2016;9(6):940–1.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Cain JA, Spivak NM, Coetzee JP, Crone JS, Johnson MA, Lutkenhoff ES, Real C, Buitrago-Blanco M, Vespa PM, Schnakers C, et al. Ultrasonic deep brain neuromodulation in acute disorders of consciousness: a proof-of-concept. Brain Sci. 2022;12(4):428.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Cain JA, Spivak NM, Coetzee JP, Crone JS, Johnson MA, Lutkenhoff ES, Real C, Buitrago-Blanco M, Vespa PM, Schnakers C et al: (2023) Neural correlates of behavioral recovery following ultrasonic thalamic stimulation in chronic disorders of consciousness. medRxiv 2023:2023.2007.2013.23292523

  31. Di Perri C, Bahri MA, Amico E, Thibaut A, Heine L, Antonopoulos G, Charland-Verville V, Wannez S, Gomez F, Hustinx R. Neural correlates of consciousness in patients who have emerged from a minimally conscious state: a cross-sectional multimodal imaging study. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15(8):830–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Darrow DP, O’Brien P, Richner TJ, Netoff TI, Ebbini ES. Reversible neuroinhibition by focused ultrasound is mediated by a thermal mechanism. Brain Stimul. 2019;12(6):1439–47.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang T, Pan N, Wang Y, Liu C, Hu S. Transcranial focused ultrasound neuromodulation: a review of the excitatory and inhibitory effects on brain activity in human and animals. Front Hum Neurosci. 2021;15:749162.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Legon W, Bansal P, Tyshynsky R, Ai L, Mueller JK. Transcranial focused ultrasound neuromodulation of the human primary motor cortex. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):10007.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Arulpragasam A, Faucher C, Van’t Wout-Frank M, Mernoff S, Correia S, Van Patten R, Greenberg B, Philip N. P369 First-in-human use of low intensity focused ultrasound in depressed patients safety and tolerability outcomes. Biol Psychiatry. 2022;91(9):S236–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Legon W, Adams S, Bansal P, Patel PD, Hobbs L, Ai L, Mueller JK, Meekins G, Gillick BT. A retrospective qualitative report of symptoms and safety from transcranial focused ultrasound for neuromodulation in humans. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):5573.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Blackmore J, Shrivastava S, Sallet J, Butler CR, Cleveland RO. Ultrasound neuromodulation: a review of results, mechanisms and safety. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2019;45(7):1509–36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Pasquinelli C, Hanson LG, Siebner HR, Lee HJ, Thielscher A. Safety of transcranial focused ultrasound stimulation: a systematic review of the state of knowledge from both human and animal studies. Brain Stimul. 2019;12(6):1367–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Finfer S, Cook D, Machado FR, Perner A. Clinical research: from case reports to international multicenter clinical trials. Crit Care Med. 2021;49(11):1866–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Huang Y, Dmochowski JP, Su Y, Datta A, Rorden C, Parra LC. Automated MRI segmentation for individualized modeling of current flow in the human head. J Neural Eng. 2013;10(6):066004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Thibaut A, Schiff N, Giacino J, Laureys S, Gosseries O. Therapeutic interventions in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(6):600–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Martin E, Aubry JF, Schafer M, Verhagen L, Treeby B, Pauly KB. ITRUSST consensus on standardised reporting for transcranial ultrasound stimulation. Brain Stimul. 2024;17(3):607–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Bian N, Yuan Y, Li X. Effects of transcranial ultrasound stimulation on blood oxygen metabolism and brain rhythms in nitroglycerin-induced migraine mice. Neuromodulation Technol Neural Interface. 2024;27(5):824–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurom.2023.12.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Chen X, Wang D, Zhang L, Yao H, Zhu H, Zhao N, Peng X, Yang K. Neuroprotective effect of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on the mouse MPTP/MPP+ model of dopaminergic neuron injury. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2021;47(8):2321–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Mesik L, Parkins S, Severin D, Grier BD, Ewall G, Kotha S, Wesselborg C, Moreno C, Jaoui Y, Felder A, et al. Transcranial low-intensity focused ultrasound stimulation of the visual thalamus produces long-term depression of thalamocortical synapses in the adult visual cortex. J Neurosci. 2024;44(11):e0784232024.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Wang Z, Yan J, Wang X, Yuan Y, Li X. Transcranial ultrasound stimulation directly influences the cortical excitability of the motor cortex in parkinsonian mice. Mov Disord. 2020;35(4):693–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Todd N, McDannold N, Borsook D. Targeted manipulation of pain neural networks: the potential of focused ultrasound for treatment of chronic pain. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020;115:238–50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Stern JM, Spivak NM, Becerra SA, Kuhn TP, Korb AS, Kronemyer D, Khanlou N, Reyes SD, Monti MM, Schnakers C. Safety of focused ultrasound neuromodulation in humans with temporal lobe epilepsy. Brain Stimul. 2021;14(4):1022–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NNSFC), China; Contract grant number: 82102645; Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation, China; Contract Grant Number: 2021A1515011042; China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, China; Contract Grant Number: 2019M662995; Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou: 2025A04J3777.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DY, SF, MZ and YS drafted the original manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. DY and SF contributed to the work equally and should be regarded as co-first authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu Shi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, D., Fu, S., Zhao, M. et al. The promise of transcranial focused ultrasound in disorders of consciousness: a narrative review. Crit Care 29, 109 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05338-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05338-2

Keywords