- Correspondence
- Open access
- Published:
The development of a non-contact tachycardia and tachypnea monitoring system, a clinical trial on shock patients
Critical Care volume 29, Article number: 5 (2025)
Dear Editor,
Antimicrobial therapy and other treatments are strongly desired to reduce the mortality rate of patients in septic shock [1]. Joo Heung Yoon et al. reported a machine learning model-based method for predicting hypotensive events using physiological vital signs in the intensive care unit (ICU) [2]. In clinical settings including outside the ICU, such as a general ward or elderly care facility, blood pressure is not always measured frequently, and vital signs of shock are sometimes overlooked. To alert medical professionals of the possibility of shock by 24-h measuring shock-induced compensatory tachycardia and accompanying tachypnea, we developed a vital sign-based, non-contact, 24-h continuous monitoring system, which does not need any electrodes or blood pressure cuffs that burden patients. The proposed system uses dual 24 GHz Doppler radars beneath the bed mattress, each transmitting at a power (10 mW) comparable to wireless microphones [3, 4]. Previously, our research group proposed an infection screening method using Doppler radar-derived vital signs [5]. Using the same Doppler radar, the system described herein makes non-contact and 24-h measurements of tachycardia and tachypnea. We had difficulty making non-contact heart rate (HR) measurements in shock-induced patients because shock drastically decreased HR-related radar output signals. To solve this problem, we developed a novel method that uses a power spectrum density (PSD)-averaged signal for patients in shock (PASS).
The clinical study of the proposed system was conducted at Genkikai Yokohama Hospital, Nananosato elderly care facility, and Airanomori elderly care facility, using bedridden patients (3 males, 9 females, aged 52–91 y) with possible acute exacerbation. As a reference, systolic blood pressure (SBP) was measured using a blood pressure cuff, and HR was evaluated using a pulse oximeter on a fingertip.
Figure 1 shows a non-contact tachycardia and tachypnea monitoring system using dual compact Doppler radars located beneath bed mattresses (Fig. 1a) and the PASS to determine whether SBP is 90 mmHg or less (Fig. 1b–e). The radar output signal of a patient in septic shock and with SBP of 60 mmHg is shown in Fig. 1b. The PASS was derived from 512 averages of the PSD (Fig. 1e), which was obtained from the fast Fourier transform (FFT) of the radar output signal over a 60 s window shifting in 5 s steps. Even without using the PASS, the respiratory rate (RR) used for tachypnea evaluation could be derived from a PSD peak (in this case, 0.5 Hz [30 breathes/min]) (Fig. 1c) because the respiratory PSD amplitude was much larger than the cardiac PSD amplitude. In addition to the 0.5 Hz respiratory frequency, the PSD of the radar output signal contained the second harmonic (1.0 Hz), but the heartbeat frequency component was not observed (Fig. 1c, d). In contrast, the PASS revealed a compensatory elevated HR at 2.47 Hz (148 bpm) after comb filtering to erase the high-frequency harmonics of the respiratory component (Fig. 1e). The correlation between the reference HR and that detected using the proposed system was improved from − 0.16 without PASS-based measurement to 0.60 with PASS-based measurement (Fig. 1f, g).
a System configuration of a vital sign-based, non-contact system for continuously monitoring tachycardia and tachypnea. Dual compact radars beneath the bed mattress detect tachycardia from the power spectrum density (PSD)-an averaged signal for patients in shock (PASS). b Radar output signal (averaged 512 times) of a patient in shock with a systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 60 mmHg. c The PSD of the radar output signal revealed shock-induced tachypnea (respiratory rate (RR) = 30 breaths/min [0.5 Hz]). d Without PASS-based measurement, the heart rate (HR) at approximately 2.47 Hz was not observed. e The PASS-based measurement revealed shock-induced compensatory tachycardia (HR = 148 bpm [2.47 Hz]) and improved the correlation between the reference HR and the proposed system from f − 0.16 to g 0.60. h Using HR and RR as explanatory variables, logistic regression analysis separated shock from non-shock conditions with 83% sensitivity and 88% specificity (logit score ≥ 0, suspected shock; logit Score < 0, suspected non-shock)
Two out of 12 examinees (an 80-year-old female and an 81-year-old male) developed shock with SBP < 90 mmHg. Of the 277 SBP measurements for 12 examinees, 139 had SBP ≤ 90 mmHg, and 138 had SBP > 90 mmHg. Logistic regression analysis was used to separate shock (SBP ≤ 90 mmHg) from non-shock (SBP > 90 mmHg) conditions with HR and RR as explanatory variables. The following logistic regression equation was derived:
A logit score ≥ 0 indicated suspected shock, and a logit score < 0 indicated no suspected shock (Fig. 1h). Five-fold cross-validation revealed 83% sensitivity and 89% specificity.
The proposed system has a limitation; the system has difficulty distinguishing tachycardia induced by shock from that caused by another reason. Nonetheless, we successfully made non-contact measurements of shock-induced tachycardia in a patient with an SBP of 60 mmHg with a greater sensitivity than that achieved by palpating the carotid artery; further investigation is needed.
In summary, to encourage medical professionals to test for shock when a logit score ≥ 0, the proposed PASS-based system appears promising for continuous monitoring of possible shock in locations outside the ICU, such as long-term care hospitals and facilities and in-home medical care environments. The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Genki Kai Yokohama Hospital Ethics. The patients provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- ICU:
-
Intensive care unit
- HR:
-
Heart rate
- PSD:
-
Power spectrum density
- PASS:
-
Power spectrum density-averaged signal for patients in shock
- SBP:
-
Systolic blood pressure
- FFT:
-
Fast Fourier transform
- RR:
-
Respiratory rate
References
Bauer M, Gerlach H, Vogelmann T, Preissing F, Stiefel J, Adam D. Mortality in sepsis and septic shock in Europe, North America and Australia between 2009 and 2019—results from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2020;24:239.
Yoon JH, Jeanselme V, Dubrawski A, Hravnak M, Pinsky MR, Clermont G. Prediction of hypotension events with physiologic vital sign signatures in the intensive care unit. Crit Care. 2020;24:661.
Matsui T, Kobayashi T, Hirano M, Kanda M, Sun G, Otake Y, et al. A Pneumonia screening system based on parasympathetic activity monitoring in non-contact way using compact radars beneath the bed mattress. J Infect. 2020;81:e142–4.
Otake Y, Kobayashi T, Hakozaki Y, Matsui T. Non-contact heart rate variability monitoring using Doppler radars beneath bed mattresses: a case report. Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2021;5:ytab273.
Sun G, Trung NV, Hoi LH, Hiep PT, Ishibashi K, Matsui T. Visualization of epidemiological map using an Internet of Things infectious disease surveillance platform. Crit Care. 2020;24:400.
Acknowledgements
We sincerely appreciate the help of the staff of Genkikai Yokohama Hospital, Nananosato elderly care facility, and Airanomori elderly care facility. The authors thank Ms. Saeko Nozawa for her contributions to the manuscript preparation. We thank Edanz (https://jp.edanz.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.
Funding
No funding was received.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
AS, KH and TM wrote the manuscript. KH and YH supervised the medical aspects. TK, SS, and GS contributed the engineering aspects of the monitoring system. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Genki Kai Yokohama Hospital Ethics. The patients provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Saito, A., Sato, S., Kobayashi, T. et al. The development of a non-contact tachycardia and tachypnea monitoring system, a clinical trial on shock patients. Crit Care 29, 5 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-05084-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-05084-x