Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.
Skip to main content

Table 2 Outcomes according to the targeted temperature

From: Comparison of hypothermic and normothermic targeted temperature management in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with acute coronary syndrome: a nationwide retrospective study

 

All patients

Original cohort

Crude analysis OR (95% CI)

Multivariable analysis† AOR (95% CI)

After adjustment of IPW

OR (95% CI)‡

Normothermic TTM*

Hypothermic TTM

Normothermic TTM*

Hypothermic TTM

N = 1217

N = 369

N = 848

N = 1216

N = 1217

Outcome measure

30-day neurological favorable outcome

445 (36.6)

135 (36.6)

310 (36.6)

1.00 (0.78–1.29)

1.04 (0.74–1.45)

438 (36.0)

448 (36.8)

1.03 (0.80–1.34)

30-day survival

726 (59.7)

228 (61.8)

498 (58.7)

0.88 (0.69–1.13)

0.92 (0.68–1.24)

741 (60.9)

720 (59.2)

0.93 (0.79–1.09)

  1. Values are expressed numbers (percentages) unless indicated otherwise
  2. *Normothermic TTM serves as the reference group for all odds ratios
  3. †Adjusted for age, sex, first documented rhythm by EMS personnel, prehospital adrenaline administration, prehospital advanced airway management, time from EMS call to contact with the patients, first documented rhythm after hospital arrival, PCI, IABP, and ECMO
  4. ‡Shown is the odds ratio from the univariable logistic regression analysis with IPW
Back to article page

Critical Care

ISSN: 1364-8535